In regard to peer review, I spent a sufficient amount of time providing my classmates with feedback that was certain to help guide them in the right direction upon revision time. When it came to determining how I would convey my thoughts to my peers, I knew I wanted to express my feedback to focus on the most compelling components that really serve a purpose to the project. This is because if I’m in my classmate’s shoes and was the one receiving feedback, I would want the input on what is most important and relevant to strengthen my paper. Therefore, in order to provide quality feedback, I heavily relied on the peer review workshopping 101 worksheet that we received. By referencing this, I managed to address various local and global concerns within their work in a detailed manner typically revolving around 50-150 words. To further help guide my classmates in really enhancing their work in my comments I provided references from the “They Say I Say” book, Barclay’s Formula paper, as well as example sentence starters to use. More specifically for one of my comments I suggested, “As for how to format the analysis portion I would refer to the ‘They Say I Say’ book and the templates for explaining quotations. A few examples from the book include: ‘In making this comment, X urges us to…’ ‘X’s point is that…'” So, by incorporating the resources we’ve used in this class into my peer review, I was able to direct my classmates in towards these materials as they can be very insightful especially in terms of frame working ideas. Another piece of feedback that I provided was the recommendation of incorporating the “I Say” aspect as that specific student wass lacking their perspective. Additionally on this comment that I made I mentioned some examples of how to structure and introduce their view in relation to the other authors ideas. In my feedback I stated, “For starters on how to begin exploring the two quotes, here are some phrases to consider ‘While I agree with Turkle… ‘ ‘I do not align with Kelly…’ ‘As Kelly presents points that I agree with… ‘ ‘I also believe that Turkle’s ideas are accurate…’” This shows how I approached peer review in a more analytical view as I moved beyond simply commenting on grammar mistakes or punctuation errors and focused on bigger issues involving forming relationships between various authors. Overall, rather than providing brief surface level comments that I’ve been used to in the past, I intended to elaborate on valuable concepts that serve a purpose within others’ writing. In which this required me to deeply invest in their work to further construct meaningful feedback.